OpenBSD

/-------------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jason Murray - jmurray (at) computer (dot) org                          |
| "Against stupidity, the gods themselves contend in vain"                |
\-------------------------------------------------------------------------/

On Fri, 8 Jan 1999, Jim Comen wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm trying to determine what would be the best (and most appropriate) OS
> platform for a firewall.  I've looked through several months of past
> postings on this mailing list as well as other URLs to see if I could find
> any clear direction on this issue, but I haven't seen any.
> I'm going between NT and a UNIX variant. 
>  
> I would characterize my findings as 'UNIX is more secure than NT but NT is
> fast approaching the level of security offered by UNIX'.  I've seen
> recommendations to avoid NT but backed up by generalizations, rather than
> example.  Similarly, I've seen that UNIX has been suggested as a more secure
> platform, but again, only backed up by generalization.  
> 
> I'd like to hear if my interpretation of the NT v UNIX issue is shared by
> others and would I be making a mistake if I went with NT.  I'm leaning
> towards NT because, if the two OSes are truly close in their level of
> security, it would be wise for me to go with NT since we'll have other NT
> servers on site and I'd like to restrict the number of different servers.
> 
> Thanks
> Jim
> -
> [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
> "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
> 

-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
  • ... Jim Comen
    • ... Alla Bezroutchko
    • ... coy
    • ... Jason Murray
    • ... Arran Pearson
      • ... Matt Curtin
    • ... אריק זודמן - Arik Sudman
    • ... Peter Bruderer
    • ... Brian Steele
    • ... Zuk, Allen
    • ... Kafil Din
    • ... Roger Marquis
      • ... Brian Steele
        • ... Andy Condliffe

Reply via email to