"James D. Wilson" wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Wouldn't one difference be that NT almost always takes a higher drain > on resources (memory, CPU utilization) than Unix on the same box? Yes, according to all sensible reports I've heard (and the Halloween-document). But I'm sure the NT-advocats will soon point out that RAM, CPU and HD-space is cheap, so "slim, fast OS" is not on most corporate-types tick-list when they put together a firewall-solution. With W2K, you can have _everything_ in/on in a NT-box. Good luck to those NT-shops.... cheers, Rainer -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | Rainer Duffner, Kiosk AG, Switzerland | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | | W3: http://www-stud.fh-konstanz.de/~duffner | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ - [To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
