Yes hardware is getting cheaper, but how sloppy and fat do we allow the code
to become?  Home systems are coming with 128MB of ram standard these days,
so it's OK for a NOS to require a GIG of ram to boot up(???).  Is there any
limit to just how ludicrous we plan to allow an OS's requirements to get?

CHEAPER does not equal FREE.

If that has become the case, would someone give me one of those new Alpha
21264 dual 700 configurations?  I would also like 18 gig cheetahs in a raid
5 config (fibre channel of course), 4 gigs of RAM and a couple Oxygen 402's
with a two 30" monitors.  I'll need something bigger for my firewall of
course...

Just contact me for the shipping information.

-----Original Message-----
Subject: Re: OS Platform for firewall (...the answer is..)



But I'm sure the NT-advocats will soon point out that RAM, CPU and
HD-space is cheap, so "slim, fast OS" is not on most corporate-types
tick-list when they put together a firewall-solution.


-
[To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
"unsubscribe firewalls" in the body of the message.]
  • ... Kafil Din
  • ... Roger Marquis
    • ... Brian Steele
      • ... Andy Condliffe
        • ... Paul D. Robertson
          • ... Andy Condliffe
            • ... Paul D. Robertson
              • ... Sean Semone
        • ... James D. Wilson
          • ... Rainer Duffner
            • ... Carric Dooley
        • ... Eugene Chupkin
  • ... Knapp, Ken (SD-EX)
  • ... אריק זודמן - Arik Sudman
  • ... Rao, Prashanth
  • ... Jan van Rensburg
  • ... Roger Marquis

Reply via email to