Dear All:

At the risk of being seen as the one who tries to throw a monkey  
wrench into the fine discussion you all are having, I would like to  
mention that the foregoing thread had focused entirely on alternatives  
among monist scenarios.

I see the world as dual, not in the sense of Descartes, but of  
Heraclitus. If I am correct, then any strategy predicated on a monist  
principle is destined to lead to disaster. (Stan and I have gone round  
and round on this. I see entropy as double-sided and not simply as  
disorder. [Ecological Modelling 220 (2009) 1886–1892].)

But I'm hardly the only one to warn against a monist view. Terry  
Deacon's model of self-organization, the "Autocell" acts similarly.  
The process starts by using up external gradients as quickly as  
possible, but gradually shuts down as the autocell nears  
self-completion. (Deacon, T.W. and J. Sherman. 2008. The Pattern Which  
Connects Pleroma to Creatura: The Autocell Bridge from Physics to  
Life. Biosemiotics 2:59-76.)

The best to all,
Bob

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert E. Ulanowicz                |  Tel: +1-352-378-7355
Arthur R. Marshall Laboratory      |  FAX: +1-352-392-3704
Department of Biology              |  Emeritus, Chesapeake Biol. Lab
Bartram Hall 110                   |  University of Maryland
University of Florida              |  Email <u...@cbl.umces.edu>
Gainesville, FL 32611-8525 USA     |  Web <http://www.cbl.umces.edu/~ulan>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------


Quoting Stanley N Salthe <ssal...@binghamton.edu>:

> *Replying to Karl, who said:*
>
>
> one can use a stable model used by neurology and psychology to come closer
> to understanding how our brain works. This can help to formulate the
> thoughts Pedro mentioned being obscure.
>
> One pictures the brain as a quasi-meteorological model of an extended world
> containing among others swamp, savanna, arid zones. The dissipation of water
> above these regions causes clouds to form and storms to discharge the vapor
> within the clouds. The model observes the lightnings in the model and sets
> them as an allegory to thoughts (these being electrical discharges) as
> opposed to hormones (that are the fluids in the swamps). So there is an
> assumed independence between the rainfall, the humidity of the ground, cloud
> formation and lightnings. The real meteorologists would not agree with the
> simplification that the lightning is the central idea of a rainfall, but
> this is how the picture works (at present).
>
> Why I offer these idle thoughts from the biologic sciences to FIS is that it
> is now possible to make a model of these processes in an abstract, logical
> fashion. The colleaugues in Fis are scientists in the rational tradition and
> may find useful that a rational algorithm can be shown to allow simulating
> the little tricks Nature appears to use.
>
> Nature changes the form of the imbalance, once too many or too few
> lightnings, once too much or lacking water - relative to the other
> representation's stable state. There are TWO sets of reference. The
> deviation between the two sets of references is what Nature uses in its
> manifold activities.
>
>
>       This model looks at the physical equivalences in two realms by
> modeling in thermodynamics.  Today in thermodynamics we have an advancing
> perspective known as the `Maximum Entropy Production Principle´ (MEPP) for
> relatively simple systems like weather, or Maximum Energy Dispersal
> Principle´ (MEDP) for complicated material systems like the brain.  In both
> cases the dynamics are controlled by the Second Law of Thermodynamics, which
> imposes that the available energy gradients will be dissipated in the least
> possible time, taking the easiest routes available.  This becomes very
> interesting in the brain, where the flow of depolarizations would then be
> predicted to be biased in the direction of more habitual `thoughts´.  I
> think that this prediction seems to be born out in our own experiences of
> the frequent return of our attention to various insistent thoughts.  I
> recommend that Karl inquire into MEPP.  For this purpose I paste in some
> references.
>
>
> STAN
>
>
> MEPP related publications:
>
>
> Annila, A. and S.N. Salthe, 2009.  Economies evolve by energy dispersal.
>  Entropy, 2009, 11: 606-633.
>
>
> Annila, A. and S.N. Salthe, 2010. Physical foundations of evolutionary
> theory. Journal on Non-Equilibrium Thermodynamics 35: 301-321.
>
>
> Annila, A. and S.N. Salthe, 2010.  Cultural naturalism.  Entropy, 2010, 12:
> 1325-1352.
>
>
> Bejan, A. and S. Lorente, 2010.  The constructal law of design and evolution
> in nature. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 365:
> 1335-1347.
>
>
> Brooks, D.R. and E.O. Wiley, 1988. Evolution As Entropy: Toward A Unified
> Theory Of Biology (2nd. ed.) Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
>
>
> Chaisson, E.J., 2008.  Long-term global heating from energy usage.  Eos,
> Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 89: 353-255.
>
>
> DeLong, J.P., J.G. Okie, M.E. Moses, R.M. Sibly and J.H. Brown, 2010. Shifts
> in metabolic scaling, production, and efficiency across major evolutionary
> transitions of life. Proceedings of the Natiional Academy of Sciences. Early
> EDition
>
>
> Dewar, R. C., 2003.  Information theory explanation of the fluctuation
> theorem, maximum entropy production, and self-organized criticality in
> non-equilibrium stationary states.  Journal of Physics, A  Mathematics and
> General 36: L631-L641.
>
>
> Dewar, R.C., 2005.  Maximum entropy production and the fluctuation theorem.
>  Journal of Physics A Mathematics and General 38: L371-L381.
>
>
> Dewar, R.C., 2009.  Maximum entropy production as an inference algorithm
> that translates physical assumptions into macroscopic predictions: Don't
> shoot the messenger.  Entropy 2009. 11: 931-944.
>
>
> Dewar. R.C. and A. Porté, 2008.  Statistical mechanics unifies different
> ecological patterns. Journal of Theoretical Biology 251:389-403.
>
>
> Dyke, J. and A. Kleidon. 2010. The maximum entropy production principle: its
> theoretical foundations and applications to the Earth system.  Entropy 2010,
> 12:613-630.
>
>
> Herrmann-Pillath, C., 2010.  Entropy, function and evolution: naturalizing
> Peircean semiosis.  Entropy 2010, 12: 197-242.
>
>
> Kleidon, A. (2009): Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics and Maximum Entropy
> Production in the Earth System: Applications and Implications,
> Naturwissenschaften 96: 653-677.
>
>
> Kleidon, A. (2010): Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics, Maximum Entropy
> Production and Earth-system evolution, Philosophical Transactions of the
> Royal Society A, 368: 181-196.
>
>
> Kleidon, A. and R. Lorenz (eds) Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics and the
> Production of Entropy: Life Earth, and Beyond  Heidelberg: Springer.
>
>
> Lineweaver, C.H.  2005. Cosmological and biological reproducibility: limits
> of the maximum entropy production principle.  In Kleidon, A. and Lorenz, R.
> Non-equilibrium Thermodynamics and the Production of Entropy: Life, Earth
> and Beyond. Springer Pp. 67-76.
>
>
> Lineweaver, C.H. and C.A. Egan, 2008. Life, gravity and the second law of
> thermodynamics. Physics of Life Reviews (2008)
> doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2008.08.002
>
>
> Lorenz. R.D., 2002.  Planets, life and the production of entropy.
>  International Journal of Astrobiology 1: 3-13.
>
>
> Mahulikar, S.P. and H. Herwig, 2004. Conceptual Investigation of the Entropy
> Principle for Indentification of Directives for Creation, Existence and
> Total Destruction of Order. Physica Scripta. Vol. 70, 212-22i.
>
>
> Martyushev, L.M., 2010. Maximum entropy production principle: two basic
> questions.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 365:
> 1333-1334.
>
>
> Paltridge, G., 1975.  Global dynamics and climate -- a system of minimum
> entropy exchange.  Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
> 101:475-484.
>
>
>
> Salthe, S.N., 1993.  Development And Evolution: Complexity And Change In
> Biology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
>
>
> Salthe, S.N., 2004.  The spontaneous origin of new levels in dynamical
> hierarchies.  Entropy 2004, 6[3]: 327-343.
>
>
> Salthe, S.N., 2010.  Development (and evolution) of the universe.
>  Foundations of Science.  In Press
>
>
> Schneider, E.D. and Kay, J.J., 1994.  Life as a manifestation of the Second
> Law of thermodynamics.  Mathematical and Computer Modelling 19: 25-48.
>
>
> Schneider, E.D. and D. Sagan., 2005.  Into the Cool: Energy Flow,
> Thermodynamics, and Life.  Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
>
>
> Sharma, V. and A. Annila, 2007. Natural process - natural selection.
>  Biophysical Chemistry 127: 123-128.
>
>
> Swenson, R., 1989. Emergent attractors and the law of maximum entropy
> production: foundations to a theory of general evolution. Systems Research
> 6: 187-198.
>
>
> Swenson, R., 1997. Autocatakinetics, evolution, and the law of maximum
> entropy production.  Advances in Human Ecology 6: 1-47.
>
>
> Ulanowicz, R.D.and B.M. Hannon, 1987. Life and the production of entropy.
>  Proceedings of the Royal Society B 232: 181-192.
>
>
> Vallino, J.J., 2010.  Ecosystem biogeochemistry considered as a distributed
> metabolic network ordered by maximum entropy production.  Philosophical
> Transactions of the Royal Society, B, 365: 1417-1427.
>
>
> Virgo, N. 2010, From maximum entropy to maximum entropy production: a new
> approach.  Entropy 2010, 12: 107-126.
>
>
> Zupanovic, P., S. Botric, D. Juretic and D. Kuic. 2010.  Relaxation
> processes and the maximum entropy production principle.  Entropy, 2010.12:
> 473-479.
>
>
> Zupanovic, P., D. Kuic, Z.B. Losic, D. petrov, D. juretic and M. Brumen
> 2010.  The maximum entropy production principle and linear irreversible
> processes.  Entropy 2010, 12: 996-1005.
>



_______________________________________________
fis mailing list
fis@listas.unizar.es
https://webmail.unizar.es/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fis

Reply via email to