> The reason for the difference is.... Interesting. Linux audio does seem to be a can of worms. The one consistent trend I've noticed is that the more "primitive" the sound subsystem the better it is in this application. Less versatile, maybe. I had no end of problems with Pulseaudio, Portaudio had a few minor problems but was basically OK apart from this, and OSS seems rock solid.
> It might be interesting to see how Pulse handles this. As there have been quite a few Pulse-related changes since my earlier Pulse problems I intend to try my current setup with a fresh Ubuntu 9.10 installation, so I'll do some comparisons. -- Peter G4VLC _______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
