Well I hope you are correct. 
I was talking to someone today and we both commented that we had been using 
10.1 and hadn't noticed any difference so I am hoping there is some magic 
setting that can be made that will enable 10.1 to use less memory.

--- In [email protected], "Battershall, Jeff" <jeff.battersh...@...> 
wrote:
>
> I believe FP 10.1 is specifically designed to address the two biggest issues 
> that affect the deployment of Flash on devices: Memory consumption and global 
> error handling. So help is on the way and I would think that Adobe's actions 
> in that regard are anything but lazy. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of reflexactions
> Sent: Monday, February 08, 2010 8:58 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [flexcoders] Re: Steve Jobs on Flash .......
> 
> Its not a question of whether it was possible at some point to construct 
> 'something' on a device with a limited version of flash.
> 
> Its a question of whether you can construct something like this for example
> http://www.extjs.com/deploy/dev/examples/grouptabs/grouptabs.html
> in flash with a comparable footprint and performance (a common complaint is 
> cpu utilization for some reason flash soaks up a huge amount of the cpu 
> compared to javascript).
> 
> I was testing some regex code today and the same code ran 4 times faster in 
> IE, 20 times faster in Safari and Chrome.
> 
> Its not like these issues are anything new they've been around for years but 
> they don't get fixed which I guess is what SJ was really meaning when he 
> called Adobe lazy.
> 
> --- In [email protected], Guy Morton <guy@> wrote:
> >
> > That's nuts. We built a flash app that ran on the pocket PC 5 years ago - 
> > it's mad to think flash couldn't run on something as powerful as an iPhone.
> > 
> > On the other hand, if I was looking at a new project, I'd certainly be 
> > asking myself if something like the SVGWeb toolkit from google would allow 
> > me to build something that would run native in many browsers (and in the 
> > iPhone and iPad).
> > 
> > I do think Adobe should have been looking prior to now for ways to leverage 
> > SVG and javascript - all that platform needs is a good development 
> > environment - that's something Adobe could be making money from right now.
> > 
> > Anyway...it's all rather silly and the town hall thing is farcical. Steve 
> > should have spent some of that pent up energy doing something truly great 
> > with the iPad, instead of just scaling up an iPhone.
> > 
> > Guy
> > 
> > 
> > On 08/02/2010, at 10:20 PM, reflexactions wrote:
> > 
> > > Well after 10 years plus of AS development my feelings are that SJ isn't 
> > > wrong.
> > > 
> > > We have to fend of a constant stream of complaints from users that the 
> > > app is a memory hog and slow. We tell them it will improve soon but it 
> > > never does, we tell them flash is a million times better than the 
> > > alternatives, but to be honest JavaScript has caught up and is ahead in 
> > > many things. 
> > > 
> > > Our app starts up at around 130Mb and reaches 250Mb before it levels out, 
> > > JavaScript apps are a fraction of that.
> > > 
> > > I hope his rant finally has some impact at Adobe and they pull there 
> > > finger out, becuase past experience has shown that years of 
> > > complaining/requests/bug reports gets nowhere then finally a rant in the 
> > > face of someone who matters gets them to shift, I have no idea why its 
> > > like that but time and again thats what happens.
> > > 
> > > For us it is probably too late as this week after SJ's rant we were told 
> > > to start planning the move away flash, the argument has been lost so 
> > > badly it wasn't even an argument this time.
> > > 
> > > For us to stay with flash, the next release would have to perform a 
> > > miracle in terms of memory and performace gains on Mac and PC.
> > > 
> > > Personally I don't think they can do it, I think they would be better of 
> > > making AS3 compile down to JavaScript. With maybe a lighterweight plugin 
> > > for somethings like video or graphics.
> > > 
> > > Whatever they really needed to realise all this a year ago with solutions 
> > > to be released now, not just smelling the coffee today.
> > > 
> > > --- In [email protected], Tim Romano <tim.romano@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > If the rumors about Bing are true, then this panning could also have 
> > > > something to do with Silverlight. If I were at MSFT and my role was to 
> > > > ensure that Silverlight succeeded in knocking Flash off (as Word 
> > > > knocked 
> > > > off WordPerfect back in the day, e.g.) then I'd be looking for chinks 
> > > > in 
> > > > Adobe's armor wherever they may be.
> > > > 
> > > > On 2/1/2010 2:26 PM, Paul Andrews wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It's just commercial tactics.
> > > > >
> > > > > You'd never guess he has his own tied-in development system to 
> > > > > support.
> > > > > Why wouldn't he knock flash?
> > > > >
> > > > > hworke wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20100201/tc_pcworld/stevejobsdissesapplerivalsduringtownhallmeeting
> > > > >  
> > > > > <http://news.yahoo.com/s/pcworld/20100201/tc_pcworld/stevejobsdissesapplerivalsduringtownhallmeeting>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Jobs has previously called out Adobe Flash, currently the
> > > > > > dominant animation platform on the Web, for being "too slow to be 
> > > > > useful" and Flash Lite, Adobe's versio n of Flash for mobile devices, 
> > > > > as not advanced enough for the iPhone. So it's no surprise to hear 
> > > > > Jobs called out Flash during Apple's Town Hall, but his language this 
> > > > > time sounds a little over the top. Jobs reportedly called Adobe a 
> > > > > lazy 
> > > > > company, and said that when a Mac crashes it's usually because of 
> > > > > Flash.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Whether or not that's true, it's clear that Jobs is not a fan of 
> > > > > Adobe's multimedia platform. The iPhone is routinely criticized for 
> > > > > its inability to render Flash-based Web pages, videos and games, and 
> > > > > early criticisms about the iPad also decry the lack of Flash 
> > > > > compatibility on Apple's latest device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > >
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Flexcoders Mailing List
> FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
> Alternative FAQ location: 
> https://share.acrobat.com/adc/document.do?docid=942dbdc8-e469-446f-b4cf-1e62079f6847
> Search Archives: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups Links
>


Reply via email to