throttle1000 wrote: > > The DOS is dead after 95. I know because I had > lot of problems since the WIN32 dos in WIN95 was > not any more a real dos. It was a WIN32 emulating dos. > > The file name header was no more kept as it was in the > real DOS. I kept some secret bytes in the file header > space on the real DOS .. and it worked! After WIN95 that > was lost. The system was no more the same. > > > W9x (ie. 95, 98, ME) is based on DOS. > > That is what the marketing peoble tell you! I don't belive MS > bothers to do anything too much. They just copy the same core > around and put another name on it. Just to have more sales and > to attract all the "I am so so so so profi" peoble :-) > > > WinNT, 2000 and XP are based on a *totaly* new and independant system.
[x] you don't know what you are talking about. 25 years of programming experience might be pocket calculator programming experience, but definitely no DOS and Windows programming experience. Please, don't waste my time any more. CU, Christian -- The idea is to die young as late as possible. -- Ashley Montague Whoever that is/was; (c) by Douglas Adams would have been better... _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
