On Wed, 2003-02-05 at 17:56, David Megginson wrote: > James Turner writes: > > > If so, seems like we're kind of shooting ourselves in the foot .... or > > am I just being super-anal and should just poll them as Jim Wilson > > suggests? > > This is a good discussion to start. I'm inclined to eliminate tying > altogether and have every module set properties explicitly; what does > everyone else think?
I'd really like to see tying stay in. I'm not sure we ever would have incorporated the property tree into JSBSim without it. > > All the best, > > > David -- Tony Peden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
