Tony Peden writes: > > This is a good discussion to start. I'm inclined to eliminate tying > > altogether and have every module set properties explicitly; what does > > everyone else think? > > I'd really like to see tying stay in. I'm not sure we ever would have > incorporated the property tree into JSBSim without it.
In that case, if we want change events to work, we'll have to do one of the following: 1. Require every module that ties a property to fire an update event whenever the value changes; or 2. Poll tied properties with change listeners attached inside the property system and fire the events when appropriate. I'd be include towards #2, since it would centralize the polling and do it only when actually needed. All the best, David -- David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
