On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 21:07:40 -0400, David Megginson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jim Wilson writes: > > > Seems like we'd need a more aggressive LOD method to cut these > > down. > > Or a really stupid one: build a very low-res version of each model, > and reference both it and the original in a range node in an XML > wrapper. ..generate them? Those low-res on the ground don't need an underside when we're high above'em. Far away, they are 0 to 1 black dot, unless they sport an all-over day-glo paint job, which will help make the modelling fun. ;-) -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
