Richard A Downing writes:
> 
> I'm working my way through some of the UK aerodromes, and have hit some problems 
> agreeing ANY of the decimal coordinates 
> in the FG files with the DMS coordinates given in the UK AIP.
> 
> For instance, London Gatwick (EGKK) has ARP at N510853 W0001125, which by my 
> calculations comes out as 
> 51.148056/-000.190278.  (Degrees + Minutes/60 + seconds/3600).
> As it happens the ARP for EGKK is defined by the midpoint of RW 08R/27L.
> 
> Now the FG data has Gatwick's ARP at 51.146661/-000.188750, and the midpoint of RW 
> 08R/27L at 51.146667/-000.188750 - 
> close! but not right.

!!!! WARNING !!!!!
FGFS is *NOT* a navigation tool and *NOT* to be used as such

However 

>>> from math import pi
>>> SG_RAD_TO_NM  = 3437.7467707849392526
>>> rads = (51.146661 - 51.146667) * pi / 180
>>> SG_NM_TO_METER   =   1852.0000
>>> rads * SG_RAD_TO_NM * SG_NM_TO_METER
-0.66671999989580399

or about 2 feet !

Close enough :-)

Note the FlightGear Earth model makes some assumptions that may 
not always yield this good of a result.  The assumptions and what kind 
of systematic errors they produce should be obvious to those that read 
the code and understand basic geodetics however IMHO the current 
system is *more* then 'good enough' for a simulator as the above 
demonstrates.

Cheers

Norman




_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to