* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Elliott) [2003.09.14 22:55]:
> On Monday 15 September 2003 04:04, Cameron Moore wrote:
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Norman Vine) [2003.09.13 10:39]:
> > > Jim Wilson wwrites:
> > > > Norman Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> > > > > This is a nice effect but I think this should default to off
> > > > > though in that this can cause quite a peformance hit on
> > > > > 'older' cards.  
> > > > > 
> > > > > On my geForce2 GTS the framerate hit varies between 10% and 100%
> > > > > depending on visibility range setting  and what is in view and
> > > > > time of day
> > > > > 
> > > > > i.e. starting up at default location at night brings my
> > > > > machine down to less then 10 fps which is quite a bit slower
> > > > > then what I consider 'flying'
> > > > 
> > > > Hmmmm...that's odd.  I'm seeing absolutely zero effect on my
> > > > GF2MX200 w/24bpp.  Which CPU and what depth level are you
> > > > running?
> > > 
> > > PIII 733 [EMAIL PROTECTED] bits
> > <snip/>
> > > Note on a 1.4 P4 with a geForceGo 5650 there is no noticeable differance
> > 
> > If you are on the 440BX chipset (like me), you will only get AGP 2x.
> > I've got a GF2GTS that can go up to 4x, but not on my mobo.  :-/
> 
> I'd be very surprised to find a P4 operating with a 440BX chipset.

Sorry, for the confusion.  I was talking about his PIII 733.  I left his
P4 comment in there so you could see that it may be a bus speed issue.
-- 
Cameron Moore
/ Why are they called buildings, when they're already \
\     finished? Shouldn't they be called builts?      /

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to