* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Lee Elliott) [2003.09.14 22:55]: > On Monday 15 September 2003 04:04, Cameron Moore wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Norman Vine) [2003.09.13 10:39]: > > > Jim Wilson wwrites: > > > > Norman Vine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > > > This is a nice effect but I think this should default to off > > > > > though in that this can cause quite a peformance hit on > > > > > 'older' cards. > > > > > > > > > > On my geForce2 GTS the framerate hit varies between 10% and 100% > > > > > depending on visibility range setting and what is in view and > > > > > time of day > > > > > > > > > > i.e. starting up at default location at night brings my > > > > > machine down to less then 10 fps which is quite a bit slower > > > > > then what I consider 'flying' > > > > > > > > Hmmmm...that's odd. I'm seeing absolutely zero effect on my > > > > GF2MX200 w/24bpp. Which CPU and what depth level are you > > > > running? > > > > > > PIII 733 [EMAIL PROTECTED] bits > > <snip/> > > > Note on a 1.4 P4 with a geForceGo 5650 there is no noticeable differance > > > > If you are on the 440BX chipset (like me), you will only get AGP 2x. > > I've got a GF2GTS that can go up to 4x, but not on my mobo. :-/ > > I'd be very surprised to find a P4 operating with a 440BX chipset.
Sorry, for the confusion. I was talking about his PIII 733. I left his P4 comment in there so you could see that it may be a bus speed issue. -- Cameron Moore / Why are they called buildings, when they're already \ \ finished? Shouldn't they be called builts? / _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
