I just ran FlightGear on my PC (built with cygwin under Windows) and got some numbers similar to yours (I was running at 800x600 window size). That leads me to ask for some clarification, when I say buildings, I mean this (http://homepage.mac.com/eq_fidget/mac_fgfs.jpg) and not this (http://homepage.mac.com/eq_fidget/win_fgfs.jpg). Do you have the same definition? I know how to eliminate buildings in the later case (--disable-random-objects) but not the former.
Jonathan Polley
On Sunday, October 19, 2003, at 05:38 PM, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Jonathan Polley wrote:I had to re-login to my old machine to finish transferring some files.Here are the frame rates that the old Mac was giving (it is a single
processor G4 running at 867 MHz, with 1 GB RAM, GeForce3 with 64 MB RAM).compared to 8)
On tarmac = 8 FPS (compared to 20 with the new machine) Flying at the end of the runway = 23 FPS (as compared to 50 FPS) Heading right to follow the road = 8 FPS (as compared to 13) Crossing the hill = 4 FPS (as compared to 9) Flying through the city, toward the buildings = 3 FPS, worst case (ascurious about what PC and Linux people see (with buildings turned on, of
While these number are definitely better than the old machine, I am still
course).
With an Athlon XP2400+ and a GeFX5900, I get 23fps on the city, with 2d clouds. It was 21fps with Athlon XP1800+ and Ge3 Ti200
The screen size is 1280x1024 with defaut lod settings.
-Fred
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
_______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
