Just a few comments from a sideline observer following the discussion for many months. Jon seems to be providing a point representing a vector from the current (dynamic) CG to an agreed point in space where the plane nose is expected. If this vector is updated regularly both in magnitude ( fuel burn change of CG, etc) and direction (pitch and yaw in a real-world reference), the model nose is drawn at the VRP each frame, and the model orientation tracks the matching pitch and yaw, the center of the model should stay matched to the CG the FDM uses. Now how do you determine which step in the above assumptions is failing?
--
Bill Earnest [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux Powered Allentown, PA, USA
Computers, like air conditioners, work poorly with Windows open._______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
