Andy Ross said:

> Erik Hofman wrote:
> > Why do you think that collision detection is not implemented?  You
> > can crash to the ground and to the buildings (maybe even other
> > aircraft?), so there must be some logic behind this.
> 
> Ground handling right now only uses a flat, horizontal ground plane at
> the MSL altitude of the aircraft coordinate origin.  This works fine
> for runways, but isn't good enough for ground vehicles.  This is the
> reason that you can't fly off the ski jump on the carrier without
> crashing, and why aircraft don't roll down hills.
> 
> AFAIK all the FDMs share the same bug here.  What's needed is to
> intersect each gear strut against the local scenery independently, and
> have a per-gear ground plane.

That wouldn't be difficult to do at all.  Modeling the fdm behavior on a slope
might be...I don't know.  But I think this poster is looking for other types
of collision detection,  not just the ground.

Best,

Jim


_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to