"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:

> I don't have time to play with this myself, but if someone wants to 
> apply this diff to the latest cvs, and *test* to make sure it doesn't 
> break things, *and* make sure plib still defaults to the original 
> behavior, then I think I could submit it to Steve, but I don't think it 
> will be too useful to submit a 2.5 year old diff.

Here's a version that applies to current CVS and compiles with a
tolerable amount of warnings:

  ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Devel/Plib_ssgDList2-20050105.diff

Unfortunately I don't have a clear idea on where to look at in order to
find out if it works correctly ....
Well, I'll rebuild SimGear and FlightGear and I'll see later,

Martin.
-- 
 Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

Reply via email to