On Thursday 20 January 2005 19:02, Martin Spott wrote: > "Curtis L. Olson" wrote: > > Let's not be too quick to stamp out people's ability to express their > > faith. The tides of societal whimsy shift very quickly, and if we > > tolerate stamping out opposing view points, all too soon you could find > > yourself on the loosing end of that battle. > > Curt, almost everything you write has much sense in the end, but in > this case you are terribly wrong. > > Everyone on this list is free - as a human being should be free - to > express his personal opinion (if necessary even on this developer list, > if nobody objects) as long as it is easily obvious to _everyone_ > reading this, that it is his very own personal faith. I strongly > believe nobody here intends to stamp on the MacOSX package maintainers > view point, it's just that he chose a medium to carry his opinion that > is totally unacceptable. > > I distance myself from the FlightGear project as long as it tolerates > this sort of misuse. Don't get me wrong, I very much tolerate the > _contents_ of the respective text (although I don't share it, but this > is a different story) but I can't accept the way it is being > distributed unter the flag of the FlightGear project. > > Cheers, > Martin.
I completely agree. When we accept this, what comes next? FlightGear packages with inbuild espionage and spam features? Dialers? FlightGear with inbuild advertisement for cigarettes, drugs and cleaning agent? As a consequence we should create a clean and official Mac package, anyone here with a Mac? (I don't have a Mac. :( ) Maybe it also helps to inform sourceforge about this, do they allow such misuse of their webspace? Best Regards, Oliver C. _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgearemail@example.com http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d