Erik Hofman wrote: > It is, in fact MIPSpro supported c99 before gcc did, but you need a > compiler option to enable it which is the only valid way to enable > it. Just face it, gcc behaved bad (again).
I don't follow the logic. If that were the true, then the only "valid" result of running a C compiler would be a pre-struct K&R thing, no? :) You don't bother to turn on a switch to enable structs or function prototypes, you just expect them to be there. Similarly you didn't need to to enable other non-C89 features like "//" comments or the empty array declaration. So why isn't MIPSpro behaving "badly" in *exactly* the same way by supporting these things without requiring a command line extension? I can fix the code to match compiler limitations. But I'm at a loss for why you think it is somehow GCC's fault for generating correct output for correct source code by default... Andy _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
