Hello Josh,
Josh Babcock wrote:
> [...] If you can think of any other big visible structures that you
> would like to see (sorry, I'm not tackling the bridges yet, there's
> issues with the VMAP data I don't want to deal with) let me know. No
> promises though. I don't know what your schedule is, but it's probably
> moving a lot faster than mine will be.
Regarding these scenery objects I'd say we're not tied to any sort of
schedule at all. O.k., it actually does make sense to have a correct
representation of what belongs into the base package but that's all.
Aside from that I welcome _every_ contribution, may it be a complete
set of buildings that somehow belong together or just a single building
somewhere on our world.
Yes, it _is_ nice to have an ensemble that represents the entourage of
an airport or a city centre, but a single tower somewhere "in the
boonies" that VFR pilots typically use for navigation is a valuable
addition as well.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
