--- Martin Spott <t> wrote:
> Christian Mayer wrote:
> > Martin Spott schrieb:
> 
> >> Could you probably back this with an explanation ? Voice-based ATC is
> >> done all over the world, why should'nt FlightGear do this as well ?
> > 
> > I understand the point that a real voice service does only make sense
> > when there is an ATC service (at least for the big airports and
> > instrument flying) that can handle it.
> [...]
> > Text messages have the big problem that when you are already missing a
> > few hands during landing you would need an additional hand that
> selects
> > the correct text. A voice message would be parallel...
> 
> I'd like to underline these two points:
> 1.) There won't be any volunteer who is serious about doing ATC
>     service as long as FlightGear does not have _appropriate_
>     capabilities. Appropriate capabilities in my eyes includes
>     something that resembles the functions of a radar screen plus ...
> 2.) a medium that allows ATC to communicate with the pilots in a way
>     that really allows for doing ATC. Typing text messages definitely
>     does not fall in this category because ATC as well as the pilots
>     need their hands for other tasks. I don't know a single serious
>     pilot who is capable of flying an approach with just one hand (you
>     need one for the controls and the other for throttle/flaps/whatever
>     - not to speak of the necessary skills to type only with the
>     fingers on the other hand.

I feel slightly wary of voice-based comms within FG itself, if only
because it is unlikely to be able to integrate within the current ATC/AI
code. Having human ATC is great, but a fallback AI version would allow a
small number of human ATC controllers to be part of a complete ATC
environment.

I think there is probably more mileage in the menu-style system that is
currently used for our ATC. If we could access the ATC menu options using
the keyboard (numbers 1 - 9 on the top of the keyboard?) it wouldn't take
too much effort on approach, and adding a free-form text box would be
fairly 

Of course, just because you are using a text-based ATC system for the
basic interaction, doesn't mean you can't use voice-comms on top of that
to add realism. 

Regards,

-Stuart


                
___________________________________________________________ 
NEW Yahoo! Cars - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars 
online! http://uk.cars.yahoo.com/


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems?  Stop!  Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the  web.  DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7637&alloc_id=16865&op=click
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to