On Thursday 06 April 2006 10:21, Martin Spott wrote: > this is now going to be the third release in a row that relies on PLIB > CVS, I find this is a bit unsatisfactory. I've been building CVS with plib-1.8.4 (the last release) for ages with no particular problems, so I'm not sure it's true to say that we _rely_ on PLIB CVS. This is not to detract completely from your point though...
> On the other side people are > waiting endlessly to get patches incorporated into PLIB. That seems to be true. I'm personally using Tiago's texture compression patch with 1.8.4 and it is the sort of thing that would have been applied almost immediately were it part of simgear, say. We should also bear in mind the possibility that PLIB might not be the most suitable platform for fgfs in the future and that migration to OSG would be an option. However, I'm not a coder and other than having played about with some fairly inspiring (visually) OSG applications, I have no really valid opinion on that matter; that would almost certainly be post-1.0 anyway I would imagine? Cheers, AJ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
