Curtis Olson wrote: > This will be a challenge for us as we move forward with development of > the OSG tree. How much old hardware should we support, and how far back > should we go?
I've been thinking about this too and for me it's actually quite simple. FlightGear 1.0/PLIB is fantastic for oldish hardware. Let the OSG branch proceed for new hardware features. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
