Hi, On Wednesday 09 April 2008 18:53, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> I like the idea by Stuart. But the discussion sounds > like we will have a next release in a few weeks. Well, I guess that since I've taken over many responsibilities as release coordinator, I guess the next release will largely be depending on my own agenda, and that won't allow me to work on a release in the next few weeks, I can tell you that for sure. :-) > > And will it be for sure that the next release will be > OSG? > Well, all things considered the OSG / CVS/HEAD branch is making giant leaps forward these days, whereas not much has happened to the plib branch. Even though there are still a few remaining features that would be nice to have in the OSG branch, I personally find the OSG branch so much better than the plib branch that it seems obvious to target the OSG branch to be the next release candidate. But, there are still quite a few bugs/experimental features that need cleaning up, so we also need some more time for that. All things considered, since a) my agenda doesn;t allow for a release yet, b) we really need more time on the OSG branch to allow the experimental feature to stabilize, and c) not much has happened on the PLIB branch, I would suggest that we try to aim for an OSG based release in the second half of this year. Cheers, Durk ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by the 2008 JavaOne(SM) Conference Don't miss this year's exciting event. There's still time to save $100. Use priority code J8TL2D2. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;198757673;13503038;p?http://java.sun.com/javaone _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
