On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:34 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> As far as i know, (i could be wrong and stupid) , an AI object is not FDM
> dependent, but, it can be property related.
>
> However, i am probably alone, here, to think that generic FG feature useful.
>
> Again,
>  tell me how i can build
> an AI object , => an hybrid car which goes floating on water or run on wheel
> on solid ground, without any acknowledge of which terrain is under (there is
> no FDM)

Ideally, every AI object should in fact have its own fdm, and an AI
pilot which is only providing control inputs that a real pilot would.
I don't think FDM takes a lot of cpu resources, so when we have
dedicated AI server(s) that could in fact be realized.

For now, I think you are right. If this will be used by more aircraft,
it is in fact easier to manage having it in a common place.

-- 
Csaba

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge
Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes
Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world
http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to