gerard robin wrote:
> With the c172p i have included the following:
[...]
> To me that is perfect, [...]
This is the sole point I'm talking about: Apparently, even though 'we'
have "original" drawings of the entire airframe, still none of us has
authoritative information at his hands how it is supposed to be
properly positioned 'at level'. This is the issue which I'd was trying
to sort out.
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada.
The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help
pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
