On 12/06/2008 03:25 PM, Martin Spott wrote: > This is the sole point I'm talking about: Apparently, even though 'we' > have "original" drawings of the entire airframe, still none of us has > authoritative information at his hands how it is supposed to be > properly positioned 'at level'. This is the issue which I'd was trying > to sort out.
As a step toward sorting it out, it would be nice to have a clearer idea what "at level" means. *) Level flight? -- At what airspeed? *) Parked on the ramp? -- Like this? http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/GDQG.jpg ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
