On dimanche 07 décembre 2008, gerard robin wrote: > On samedi 06 décembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote: > > gerard robin wrote: > > > With the c172p i have included the following: > > > > [...] > > > > > To me that is perfect, [...] > > > > This is the sole point I'm talking about: Apparently, even though 'we' > > have "original" drawings of the entire airframe, still none of us has > > authoritative information at his hands how it is supposed to be > > properly positioned 'at level'. This is the issue which I'd was trying > > to sort out. > > > > Cheers, > > Martin. > > Yes it is a guess, how many models here are drawn with a guess ? > not only the landing gear :) > > Giving it a pitch of -3 deg is not so bad. > Or extend more the nose gear which will be ugly.
AND The question isn't it , only: Which is the less stupid :) to keep the model floating above the ground when not in air ? or to modify the offset ? which won't shock anybody using that FG Reference Model. Easy to do, giving the possibility, latter on, to update, if somebody is able to bring the right blueprint of that Aircraft ( same model, same equipment .....). cheers -- Gérard http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/ J'ai décidé d'être heureux parce que c'est bon pour la santé. Voltaire ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
