On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 1:10 PM, John Denker <j...@av8n.com> wrote: >> Here's a proposal: >> 0) If somebody has actual data, use that; otherwise: >> 1) Put 17m diameter shacks in "enroute" locations. >> 2) Put 12m diamater shacks in "on airport" locations. >> >> >> Anybody got a better idea?
Here is a derivative idea. There are several classes of VOR (irrespective of the other radio services that might be colocated) which determine what the receivable range is ... and whether they're usable for jet routes. That change in transmitter power may be a defining factor for how big the shack is. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
