leee wrote: > But isn't one of the tasks of ./configure to test that it can find > the libs it needs, and isn't this the real problem? > > Is it not the case that ./configure has run ok, presumably believing > that it has found the libs it needs, but then generated a makefile > that fails because it can't find them? That was what I thought the > problem was. Using non-standard configurations is far from > forbidden on linux; that's why there are options (parameters) to > override normal defaults, but ./configure should be checking for > consistency and failing when it finds inconsistency, not giving the > appearance that all is well.
Agreed. I'll see if I can fix it somewhere this week (unless someone else beats me to it). By the way: I don't dislike the idea of switching to CMake but I have no experience in creating configuration files for it myself. Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
