On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 10:20 PM, John Denker <j...@av8n.com> wrote: > On 02/08/2010 10:58 AM, Geoff McLane wrote: > >> If you had read the screen during the >> ./configure ... step you would have seen >> something like :- >> Checking for osgGetVersion in -losg: no >> That 'no' is a 'clear indication' of trouble >> pending... > > I'm telling you, again, that statement is completely > false. No such indication, clear or otherwise, is > observed chez moi when reproducing the bug I am > talking about. A detailed typescript of the > configuration step can be found at > http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/bad-configure.logg
I think you two are looking at different config.log files. Geoff is talking about FlightGear itself and you, John, about SimGear. Apparently SimGear's configure script isn't as pedantic as FlightGear's and doesn't check for the presence of the libraries. It is really only a problem because it tries to build "proptest" - otherwise, to just create the simgear libraries, it wouldn't need to link against OSG. The relevant parts from FlightGear's configure script could be applied to SimGear - assuming they are working, of course. By the way, I have already suggested putting the test programs into a separate make target. I am not saying that as a fix to the current problem - even though as a side effect it would allow a build without OSG libraries. -- Csaba/Jester ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
