On 21 Jul 2010, at 18:47, Thorsten wrote:

>> My hypothesis is that something in the AI-Traffic code doesn't like being 
>> re-positioned;
> 
> Maybe related to issue #133 in bug tracker:
> http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=133
> 
> The AI code corrupts memory when the plane leaves the range of an ATC
> station. It usually happens when flying. Haven't tested repositioning
> too much, but I guess it could trigger the same scenario, when the new
> position is several miles away...
> 
> I added two patches to the tracker to fix memory corruption in the AI
> code, but they are not in GIT yet. I guess the tracker is not really
> used too much.
> 
> Maybe s.o. could have a closer look at this issue, since this
> corruption problem happened *really* often to me. I never managed to
> fly more than 40-50 miles away from an airport when AI was enabled.
> The patches in the tracker fixed the issues for me. Another workaround
> is to disable AI traffic right from the start.

The back-trace in that bug looks very familiar!

I think this is exactly the issue, but I shall do some further testing this 
evening.

Also, for bugs which have patches un-applied, please feel free to poke me, or 
post here - anything that encourage people to use the tracker is good, I think.

James


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Reply via email to