Erik Hofman wrote: > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 09:57 +0200, Erik Hofman wrote: > >> While this probably is a step in the right direction it also means ATC >> chatter will be missing (for now). >> > > Ehm, ATIS that is. > > Erik > >
Yes, I hadn't realised that when I made the suggestion, I mistakenly thought we were only discussing the attempt at intelligent AI traffic. It would be a shame to lose the ATIS, especially now it's working again following the sound changes. What I propose to do is to remove all the AI traffic stuff from ATCDCL, leaving just the ATC code, and then re-enable it at compile time by default. The AI traffic is where all the crashes originate from, and this would leave the frequency lookup and ATIS working until they are ported to the new ATC system. I've discovered that my Wife's laptop has a 3D card, so I should be able to remove the AI stuff and test it. The only user-visible feature that would be lost would be the messages to/from ATC and the AI traffic. That however is unavoidable given that that AI system is realistically unmaintainable. Cheers - Dave ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products. Visit us here for more details: http://p.sf.net/sfu/dev2dev-palm _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
