Is there a problem with maintaining vertical sync with MPCarrier? If there
is please file a report here:
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/list
Vivian
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Brown [mailto:smoothwater...@adelphia.net]
Sent: 25 January 2011 19:33
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Carrier Altitude
On Jan 25, 2011, at 2:14 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Peter Brown <smoothwater...@adelphia.net>
wrote:
I expected if flat then the polys would only go down until the mid-span of
the ocean surface and then it would rise back up to meet the terrain again.
Isn't that what is happening?
I don't believe so, as it's no where near mid-span. If the distance was
shorter I'll call it a super-long negative swell(swale?), but the distance
between the points shown in the images is longer than that. I'll do some
more research in different locations.
That said, I was looking for information about it so that the carrier could
be at actual sea level, or ocean surface rather than hovering above it. If
the height-adjust is possible, that'd be a great solution if it kept in sync
across MP.
Thanks,
Peter
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Special Offer-- Download ArcSight Logger for FREE (a $49 USD value)!
Finally, a world-class log management solution at an even better price-free!
Download using promo code Free_Logger_4_Dev2Dev. Offer expires
February 28th, so secure your free ArcSight Logger TODAY!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/arcsight-sfd2d
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
