On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 22:52 +0000, Stuart Buchanan wrote: > On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Erik Hofman wrote: > > Personally I would think adding Project Rembrandt will call for > > FlightGear version 3.0. So if it is added I would create two branches, > > version 3.0 and version 2.7 in which the later is switched to bug fixes > > only. > > Surely a bug-fix 2.7.0 branch is simply just the 2.6.0 maintenance branch? > > I'm not aware of any significant development on next so far beyond > RTI from Matthias and some materials work that I've been doing.
That's the idea indeed. just take what is in next now and push it into bugfix only mode. > > > If 3.0 turns out to require more time than expected (I probably know the > > answer to that one) then there's always a really stable version 2.8 > > which can be released. > > Sounds like a reasonably plan, but let's aim for success :) I probably should have specified that 3.0 (I realized later it is actually 2.9) will be called 'next' in git :) Erik ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
