On Monday 28 February 2005 22:23, Josh Babcock wrote:
> OK, this is making me feel kind of stupid. I never really had
> any problem with the fglrx driver before, but now I'm a bit
> stumped. I just completely rebuilt my system to take
> advantage of LVM and the deb package system as well as to
> upgrade to 2.6.10. Now, I seem to have fglrx working, but
> alas, <1 FPS in FG. dmesg reports *lots* of these:
> [fglrx:firegl_agp_lock_pages] *ERROR*
> agp_allocate_memory_phys_list failed Has anyone else seen this
> problem?
>
> Oh, to avoid confusion, the kernel and fglrx module did not
> come from a deb repository, I built them by hand. I just
> don't find the debian build process sane. I also held the
> Xfree packages so libGL.so wouldn't get clobbered.
>
> Josh
>
> Gory details below...
[snipped...]
Are you using the internal ATI agpgart or the 2.6.10 kernel
module?
I have the line
Option "UseInternalAGPGART" "yes"
in my XF86Config-4 and the kernel agpgart module is not loaded on
my system (2.4.27) so I'm guessing that you're using the 2.6.10
kernel module.
Afaik, the ATI drivers aren't claimed to be 2.6.x compatible yet
- but then I haven't checked them recently.
LeeE
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-users
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
