Hi everyone,

I *NEVER* said it was a converted MSFS aircraft....read the post again...I 
said iot "look" like a converted MSFS plane as the quality of the model is 
beyond most of the aircraft available at the moment, save a few like the 
Seneca II, in FG.
I use MSFS quite a lot (and X-Plane....), and see this quality quite a lot, 
to see it in FG was a surprise and thats what led me to think that it was a 
converted MSFS (like the current freeware Alpha Sim stuff coming out for 
FG....), model.

I also never said it was Tastuhiro 's work, as his email post said he had a 
collection of links placed on his (?) site so we can check them out without 
having to search the web via google etc.

If there has been any misunderstanding then I am sorry but Arnt, you went 
off the deep end here dude.
Im didnt know that JSBsSim had a newsletter so was unaware of the fantastic 
model made for FG from scratch by a very talented modeler.....I look forward 
to any of thier nerxt creations woith baited breath.

Its Christmas....go open presents everyone!! :)

Slainte,

Andy
NZCH





>
>> > >> Tatsuhiro San,
>> > >>
>> > >> thank you for the links....I now have a fantastic looking SU-26M
>> > >> acrobatic  plane in my hangar. It looks like it was converted
>> > >from an > MSFS 2004 model,
>> > >
>> > > ..hang on a sec, _is_ it?  It _is_ your work, Tatsuhiro-san?
>> > >
>> > > ..beautiful looks does not always come from Microsoft.  Lecture
>> > > follows: Microsoft has their own theories on both the GPL and
>> > > copyright, they instead prefer to rely on "EULA" contracts, which
>> > > is much easier  to litigate if you're wrong but have big pockets,
>> > > than the GPL and copyright law.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Now stop it!
>> >
>> > This discussion is due to a *pure rumor* from Andrew Gorman.
>
> .._agreed_.
>
>> > The author of this plane is "Flying Toaster" and as I understood him
>> > it is his own work.
>> >
>> > Su-26 v1.0 alpha 1
>>
>> Yes. See the last issue of the JSBSim newsletter. Enrique's Su-26 is
>> the "cover story".
>>
>> Jon
>
> ..Tatsuhiro-san, Andrew, Georg, Jon, I thank you all for helping secure
> Enrique's Su-26 and FlightGear from the litigation risks, by disclosing
> all relevant facts here and leaving absolutely _no_ viable loose end as
> a litigation risk. :o)
>
> ..the only remaining problem is how we still needs to watch our own slip
> of minds and our own language for new such loose ends until Microsoft is
> gone.  We are not as free to throw around ideas or even compliments
> here as we should be, it is not enough to know we are squeaky clean,
> we actually has to make sure precisely that info is available right here
> on this email list.
> Insurance, just like safety belts, parachutes and nukes.
>
> -- 
> ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
> ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
>  Scenarios always come in sets of three:
>  best case, worst case, and just in case.
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Flightgear-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users
> 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-users

Reply via email to