On Tuesday 08 May 2007 05:12:58 michael sephton wrote: > > > Now, back to the topic, is it something going to be done with website or not? > > > I think when someone has the time they can download the fltk website via > svn as described here: http://www.fltk.org/svn.php#CHECKOUT. They can > modify it until they think they have a superior design. Then they can > put it up on the web somewhere to show the fltk community, and perhaps > everyone will agree whether or not it is a good replacement, or perhaps > the community can have some kind of vote, or perhaps the main developers > will simply accept or reject the suggested alternative design.
Or maybe we all talked for nothing. If by changing few entries in (I guess) several CSS files, you suggest that one should download the whole website modify it, put it somwhere where people could view it, only to be probably rejected once more, because its not too "programmerish" than *that* is a waste of time. There is no need to be ironic by saying "superior desig", I personally wanted only to help by pointing out some of the things that makes people, deciding which GUI library to start using, that FLTK is serious and mature library. Anyway I'm done with this. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
