In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
 Roman Burkovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> 2. (useful)
> I write it here. That means - I really did understand how to use this forum. 
> But it was not as easy as You may think. I am not alone with this opinion. 
> Take a look at http://forums.codeblocks.org/index.php/topic,3396.0.html
> This is a link to Code::Blocks IDE forum. Did You noticed the absence of FLTK 
> in the voting list? Why is it so? Some people that are aware of FLTK say 
> there that fltk.org website sucks completely. That is not the case. But the 
> forum sucks - that's for sure. Newbies are very scared by it and run away. 
> That is bad. They can't use a feedback system and are missed for FLTK 
> community.

The websites you mentioned are (IMHO) pure crap. Web based forums are 
inconsistent, uneasy to read, and they just tend to lower the audience 
level. Use nntp. I used the FLTK web interface maybe once or twice just 
to do some searches, and it seemed good enough for that. But with nntp 
or gmane.org at hand, it's pointless to do any better.

> With it FLTK.org will not look like crazy indie project but rather like a 
> "mature, spreaded WWWorldwide library". If it will look so - it will be 
> exactly IT (widely used library).
> I would think that it is a GOAL. Isn't it? If so, You could sacrifice a 
> unique "red on magnetta" style of the forum for the sake of popularity.

One thing I like by FLTK is that it's a TRUE mature project.
Very good development model. Wonderful staff, probably one of the best 
I've ever seen for any OSS/GUI toolkit out there. Small but 
knowledgeable community. No crappy unmaintained wik: there's solid, true 
documentation. Those that nobody wants to write.

Those who don't choose FLTK because they think the web page suck will 
only moan about the need for yet another ultra-fancy theme engine so 
that their application look "totally unconventional". Let those build 
Web2.0 sites with AJAX directly, instead.

</evil>
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to