> On Tuesday 29 May 2007 15:35:28 Michael Sweet wrote:
>> Most of the 2.0 development is being done by Bill, Fabien, and Sanel.
>> So far this year:
>
> I'm curious, why don't they join this discussion and say their opinion?? If
> library rests mainly on their shoulders, then that is vital, in contrary this
> all this is just a rant :)
Mike is probably the only one with the best view on who's doing what,
as he's the lead.
I do think Sanel weighed in already:
http://fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.general+v:22225
http://fltk.org/newsgroups.php?gfltk.general+v:22261
I think Sanel's comments strongly against 1.x continuance have been
assuaged by Mike's recent post that 1.x and 2.x are maintained by
different people, so 1.x has not been affecting 2.x dev.
Bill's pretty busy I'd think; Nuke, his commercial compositing software,
was bought up from Digital Domain by The Foundry, and he moved with the
software to the new company:
http://www.thefoundry.co.uk/promo/nuke.html
..so now he's full focus on that, I imagine.
Bill's usually a frequent poster, but his last post on fltk.general
was ~4 months ago back in January, so we may not be hearing from him
for a while; my guess is he's focused purely on 2.x dev, because IIRC
Nuke might be using FLTK 2 now, so I'm fairly sure he's entirely focused
on that.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
