> > Also, if we are going to break the 1.1 ABI, do we want to 
> re-name some 
> > of the more inaccurately named functions and methods whilst 
> we are at it?
> 
> My recommendation would be to rename them and provide the old names
> as inline methods/functions that are flagged as deprecated.  Then if
> (*if*) we did another minor/major release we could remove them.

Can the "old names" have #warnings (or something) attached so they will
throw a caution at compile time? I know a lot of my x86 Mac stuff does
that, and whilst it is really annoying, it has helped me tidy things
up...!

SELEX Sensors and Airborne Systems Limited
Registered Office: Sigma House, Christopher Martin Road, Basildon, Essex SS14 
3EL
A company registered in England & Wales.  Company no. 02426132
********************************************************************
This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended
recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended
recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender.
You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or
distribute its contents to any other person.
********************************************************************

_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to