Christian Convey wrote:

> I'm about to start a new hobby project that needs a GUI.  I'd like to give
> FLTK a shot, but I can't tell whether I should go with 1.x or 2.0.
> 
> My application doesn't need to be super robust at this point, but I'd also
> like to not spend lots of time fighting against an unpolished version of
> the FLTK library.
> 
> From the website, it's a little hard to tell how mature FLTK 2.0 is
> considered.  Can anyone recommend a version for me to use?

Personally, I like and use FLTK 1.3.x. It's stable and development on it
highly active. I of use the weekly snapshots. I haven't had any problems
switching to each FLTK 1.3.x snapshot.

-- 
Alvin
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to