Christian Convey wrote: >>> I'm about to start a new hobby project that needs a GUI. I'd=20 >>> like to give FLTK a shot, but I can't tell whether I should=20 >>> go with 1.x or 2.0. >>> =20 >>> My application doesn't need to be super robust at this point,=20 >>> but I'd also like to not spend lots of time fighting against=20 >>> an unpolished version of the FLTK library. >>> =20 >>> >From the website, it's a little hard to tell how mature FLTK=20 >>> 2.0 is considered. Can anyone recommend a version for me to use? >> For a hobby project, I'd recommend 1.3. For a robust product, 1.1. >> If you have the time, and want to help advance 2.0, then use that, >> feedback the changes, and help move it forward. > > Thanks for the suggestion. I'd consider using 2.0, as long as it's not going > to be an exercise in masochism. > > Do you know where I can get information on its current status? For example, > are there numerous test programs that build and run cleanly using FLTK 2? > > And is there an estimated completion date for FLTK 2? > > Thanks, > Christian
Well, I use FLTK 2.0 for a pretty serious project with deadline at the end of April. I would say it is pretty much stable. Sure there are some problems, but I fix them on the fly, or use some workarounds. If you chose FLTK 2.0, please feel free to either write here, or e-mail me directly. Best regards _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
