> > > I'm about to start a new hobby project that needs a GUI. I'd=20 > > like to give FLTK a shot, but I can't tell whether I should=20 > > go with 1.x or 2.0. > >=20 > > My application doesn't need to be super robust at this point,=20 > > but I'd also like to not spend lots of time fighting against=20 > > an unpolished version of the FLTK library. > >=20 > > >From the website, it's a little hard to tell how mature FLTK=20 > > 2.0 is considered. Can anyone recommend a version for me to use? > > For a hobby project, I'd recommend 1.3. For a robust product, 1.1. > If you have the time, and want to help advance 2.0, then use that, > feedback the changes, and help move it forward.
Thanks for the suggestion. I'd consider using 2.0, as long as it's not going to be an exercise in masochism. Do you know where I can get information on its current status? For example, are there numerous test programs that build and run cleanly using FLTK 2? And is there an estimated completion date for FLTK 2? Thanks, Christian _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
