Christian Convey wrote: > Thanks for the suggestion. I'd consider using 2.0, as long as it's not going > to be an exercise in masochism.
I'd recommend 1.1 or 1.3 for a start. Support and development is much better. > Do you know where I can get information on its current status? http://www.fltk.org/roadmap.php#1.1 stable, bug fixes only http://www.fltk.org/roadmap.php#1.3 in development (utf-8 support) http://www.fltk.org/roadmap.php#2.0 very little development > For example, are there numerous test programs that build and run cleanly > using FLTK 2? All FLTK versions include a test directory with demo programs. > And is there an estimated completion date for FLTK 2? No. If you try one version, you should be aware that the 1.x series are almost API-compatible, while 2.0 has another API. Albrecht _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
