> Christian Convey wrote: > > > Thanks for the suggestion. I'd consider using 2.0, as long as it's not > > going to be an exercise in masochism. > > I'd recommend 1.1 or 1.3 for a start. Support and development is much > better. > > > Do you know where I can get information on its current status? > > http://www.fltk.org/roadmap.php#1.1 stable, bug fixes only > http://www.fltk.org/roadmap.php#1.3 in development (utf-8 support) > http://www.fltk.org/roadmap.php#2.0 very little development > > > For example, are there numerous test programs that build and run cleanly > > using FLTK 2? > > All FLTK versions include a test directory with demo programs. > > > And is there an estimated completion date for FLTK 2? > > No. > > If you try one version, you should be aware that the 1.x series are > almost API-compatible, while 2.0 has another API. > > Albrecht
Thanks Albrecht. You've convinced me to stick with 1.3 for now. - Christian _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
