I was re-reading the Article #825(Versioning an vision), and I am trying to figure out which is the best release to work with. It seem that 1.3 will be the actively supported release in the future, so I should abandon ftlk2(and my thousand++ loc in fltk2). FLTK-core-team should also discontinue the dev of fltk2 release. (I also hope that 1.4 will not start/released in parallel with 1.3).
As you said,I was seriously thinking of correcting the fluid2(already started). But why bother to do so in a release without clear future? I wouldnt want to end up be alone out there. It seems better to port my fltk2 apps to 1.3 and port any fltk2 futures in 1.3 (as needed). > > > > Many other things does not work/missing either in fluid2=20 > > (filechooser in win32,code viewer). It seems that fltk2 dev=20 > > has left behind. > > Yes, that is correct, the fltk2 tree is largely experimental, and not > all the features that are working in the fltk-1.1 and fltk-1.3 series > have been implemented in flkt2 yet.=20 > Perhaps they never will be, unless someone can take on the task? > It is community supported open-source after all, so if you need that > functionality, feel free to add it. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
