Matt: >> Wouldn't it be much easier to join the FLTK team and use al the >> existing infrastructure, like web page, SVN, bug list, and mailing >> lists? Why would you want to fork a perfectly healthy project?
Gerry: > We don't intend to fork FLTK. I suppose I may have sent the wrong > message. [...] Putting our work into the FTLK project IS the first > and best choice. > > I must say I am pleasantly surprised by how y'all are responding to > this (based on past experience with other projects). We are just > trying to find a good place to setup camp. However, I would imagine > that something will come up eventually that everyone won't be as > interested in. That being said, it would appear that may be a little > ways off. Why don't we just take things one step at a time and see > how it goes? We could start a dialog about the CMake build and just > let things take their natural course from there. Don't know where the others stand on this, but it seems to me that the biggest boost you could give to FLTK1 at the moment would be to eyeball the new UTF-8 code, so that we can get FLTK-1.3.x out of the door. And if you have suggestions about improving the interface, or the UTF-8 code directory structure, that would be brilliant. Cheers D. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
