On 28 Jun 2009, at 9:16, Gerry Weaver wrote: > Perhaps you can clear something up for me. Is FLTK2 the ultimate > goal or is 1.3.x going to slowly evolve into what FLTK2 was > intended to be?
The latter, I think - the fltk-1.v series evolves to be what fltk-2 was intended to be, but attempting to keep the bug-count low and the stability quotient high at all times (rather than fltk-2's occasionally lumpy ride!) > For example, if one was going to work on an abstraction layer, what > version would they be working with? Based on what I've seen so far, > it would almost make more sense to create the abstraction in 1.3.x > and then pull the new api over as a completely separate interface. > That should make everyone happy. Sounds good to me, if you think you can make it work, then I say go for it! -- Ian _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
