Duncan: > There was talk of trying > to define a common low-level interface to the UTF-8 stuff that could > be > shared by both FLTK-1.3.x and FLTK2. After the 1.3.x release of > course.
Perhaps you can clear something up for me. Is FLTK2 the ultimate goal or is 1.3.x going to slowly evolve into what FLTK2 was intended to be? For example, if one was going to work on an abstraction layer, what version would they be working with? Based on what I've seen so far, it would almost make more sense to create the abstraction in 1.3.x and then pull the new api over as a completely separate interface. That should make everyone happy. Thanks, Gerry _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
