> > I do a simple test and I found that I can see the=20 > > theretentivity of vision when delay is > 0.02, a little=20 > > small than 1/25. So 0.01 is enough for most of people I guess. > > What refresh rate is your monitor? > > Most lcd panels seem to be 60Hz or similar.=20 > So 0.01 (100Hz) is probably still wasteful, as you might render 100 > frames of which only 60 will ever be displayed, 40 may be lost entirely > - that's pretty wasteful... > > In which case, 0.017 might be worth a shot? > Though, that's about 59Hz, so depending on how your graphics card > handles things, that might actually beat really horribly with the 60Hz > monitor refresh, so... > > And note that 0.02 is not 1/25 (or 25Hz), it's 50Hz - twice as fast. > > To be honest, I'd be surprised if most people noticed the flicker at > 0.04 (which is 25Hz) in practice on a typical monitor, especially the > current crop of lcd monitors... > > When Delay is 0.03, the flicker is obvious. I can tell the difference between 0.01 and 0.02. 0.02 may be a good value for the current crop of LCD monitors. :).
_______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
